Dayton proposes $220M for water infrastructure, quality

Saying the state can no longer take clean drinking water 鈥渇or granted,鈥 Gov. Mark Dayton on Thursday unveiled a $220 million proposal to patch up the state鈥檚 aging wastewater and drinking water infrastructure and protect water quality.
The plan includes $167 million in bonding money to help cities upgrade their water infrastructure, part of a larger 2016 bonding recommendation he鈥檚 expected to release Friday morning.
In addition, it offers $52.7 million for various 鈥渨ater quality protection initiatives.鈥
Dayton said the money is necessary to 鈥渞eplace aging wastewater and drinking water systems鈥 and 鈥渦pgrade treatment facilities to meet higher standards, and expand systems to accommodate growth.鈥
But it鈥檚 just a down payment on long-term fixes that aren鈥檛 cheap, and it remains to be seen whether there will be bipartisan support for the plan.
State Rep. Greg Davids, R-Preston, said in an interview that he believes there will be 鈥渁 lot of support for infrastructure funding鈥 among Republicans, and that the GOP will give 鈥渟erious consideration鈥 to those kinds of investments.
鈥淥ur caucus is very supportive of those issues,鈥 Davids said.
Citing information from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Dayton said the state faces $11 billion worth of needs in this area over the next 20 years, which is 鈥渙bviously a huge price tag.鈥
Still, 鈥渁s we learned with our transportation infrastructure, if we don鈥檛 keep up with the needs 鈥 we get farther behind the eight ball,鈥 Dayton said in a conference call with reporters.
After the initial $220 million, an additional $100 million a year in state bonding would be needed for the next 20 years to address Minnesota鈥檚 water infrastructure needs.
If approved by the Minnesota Legislature, the water infrastructure plan would allow the state to fund up to 80 projects a year compared with fewer than 50 projects now, and it would boost average state assistance to municipalities to $300 million a year, up from $160 million, the governor鈥檚 office said.
A 2013 report from the American Society of Civil Engineers said Minnesota鈥檚 drinking water and wastewater infrastructure has a combined $11.5 billion worth of needs over the next 20 years. That breaks down to $7.4 billion for drinking water and $4.1 billion for wastewater.
Stephanie Menning, executive director of the Minnesota Utility Contractors Association, said she鈥檚 encouraged by Dayton鈥檚 proposal, as well as recently approved federal funding.
In December, Congress approved legislation that provides $1.394 billion for the U.S. EPA鈥檚 Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund program, and $863 million for the Safe Drinking Water program.
鈥淚t鈥檚 almost like, both federally and statewide, folks are starting to wake up to the fact that clean drinking water is a necessity. It鈥檚 needed for everyday life,鈥 she said.
Minnesota cities lean heavily on federally funded loan programs, known as 鈥渟tate revolving loan funds,鈥 for projects ranging from water mains to water treatment plants. The Minnesota Public Facilities Authority administers those funds.
Jeff Freeman, director of the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, said funding decisions are based on a priority list, but he hastened to add that the state always has more funding requests than available money.
Thus, cities are often faced with 鈥渄ifficult choices鈥 of putting off projects or borrowing more money than they can afford to carry out these 鈥渋mportant and critical projects,鈥 he said.
Ed Ehlinger, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health, said people often take clean drinking water for granted until a crisis arises. He referred to the crisis in Flint, Michigan, where the National Guard has had to pass out bottled water because the city鈥檚 tap water supply has been polluted with lead.
In Minnesota, about 60 percent of the needed improvements are in Greater Minnesota. Without state help, more Minnesotans 鈥渨ill face steep increases in their local water utility bills to pay for clean, safe drinking water,鈥 Dayton said.
John Linc Stine, commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, said he has heard from local communities about their needs to improve deteriorating pipes, including some that are more than 100 years old.
Infrastructure of that vintage is not unusual, Menning said. A couple of years ago in St. Paul, she noted, crews updated brick sewer lines under Marshall Avenue that were installed by Italian immigrants at the turn of the previous century.
鈥淣o one thinks about it until it鈥檚 broken,鈥 she said.
The $220 million in requests would include these projects:

$62 million for the Point Source Implementation Grant Program, which helps communities pay for treatment plant upgrades to address water quality restoration and protection goals.
$80 million for the Water Infrastructure Funding Program to increase aid to communities rehabilitating aging wastewater and drinking water infrastructure systems.
$25 million for Clean Water & Drinking Water Revolving Funds, which help local governments update clean water and drinking water projects.
$30 million for the Reinvest in Minnesota Reserve program, which works with farmers and private landowners to restore and protect water quality in the implementation of the new buffer law passed last session.
$5 million for a Metropolitan Council initiative that provides matching grants to local governments to keep clear water from entering the municipal wastewater system.
$5 million to replace an estimated 300 acres of wetlands that are lost due to road construction.
$12.7 million to clean up contaminated sediment and industrial waste at 10 locations at the St. Louis River Estuary and the Duluth harbor and bay.

RELATED CONTENT:

Spending cuts trickle down to water projects
List of infrastructure projects by city.聽

Like this article? Gain access to all of our great content with a month-to-month subscription. SPECIAL:聽Start your subscription聽with our low intro rate of just $9.99.聽
Share this:PrintFacebook1LinkedInTwitterGoogle +1


Download

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *